Haditha:Are we calling this a scandal or is it a result of war? Let's take a gander at Kilo Company. Late last year, US Commanders tried to hold Haditha ( a town of about 90,000) which was just peppered with insurgents and at the time it fell to one company of 160 men, yep, Kilo Company, 3rd Batallion, 1st Marines. In 2004 Kilo Company got the short end of the stick. There were days of endless street fighting and even house-to-house fighting. Nothing one would think unusual for where they were, right? Well, during one of these operations, a Kilo unit got ambushed inside a house by about 6 insurgents armed with machine guns and grenades. One Marine died and several were wounded. The unit was trapped inside, with the insurgents in the adjoining rooms. The Marines had little option but to blow up the house in order to kill the insurgents and escape with their lives.
After pulling out of Fallujah, Kilo Company returned home, but they were gearing up for another tour in Iraq. Back in Iraq again, where most of Kilo had one tour to Iraq under their belts, some with two and one was working on his third, it was surprising their attitudes were pretty decent. There was a certain amount of antagonism and frustration but nothing that would seem out of place. During their daily sweep for weapons, the unit uncovered a lot of IEDs (improvised explosive devices) rigged to blow up all over Haditha (where they were assigned on their next tour), insurgents were getting more brazen, once the Marines had checked an area, the insurgents would come back and plant a couple more IEDs.
In the matter of the recent tragedy of Haditha, one can't help but ask oneself... was the tragedy done with provocation? (Kilo had lost a beloved brother in Miguel Terrazas, who was driving a humvee that got blown up) And I say provocation in that these Brothers in Arms lost someone very beloved to them and maybe someone(s) lost their cool and their perspective OR were they merely reacting to a situation, shaped by a previous experience?(It only takes
one person to be armed to make a situation explosive). The Marines had no way of confirming, at the time, if others were armed either.
For those of us who have never had to be part of a war, we will never be able to understand what those who face this kind of thing. We can never say for certain, in any given circumstance, what we would do when faced by a situation as those of the Kilo unit encountered. We'd like to think that we wouldn't shoot first and ask questions later. We'd like to believe that. The reality is, we'll never know and we hope to heaven we never do. We thank the Deity we believe in that we aren't walking in those soldiers shoes, facing day after day, year after year, the situations they do, making the decisions they have to and then learning to live with it until the day we die.
As for the situation, the tragic recent happenings in Haditha, I can only hope it didn't come about out of revenge. While I wish with all my heart it never happened, that innocent lives weren't lost, I can hope it happened out of fear and a trigger finger for survival. Those are emotions and skills of survival in a land where the bad guys have no respect for innocents, they just look for a means to an end. Maybe there weren't any bad guys in that house. But placed in the shoes of Kilo Company, how can one be sure of anything? Experience becomes your teacher mighty fast in a hostile place. Kill or be killed. When you think about the young men we send over there, the total time in country, I can't honestly say I would find these men guilty of deliberate slaughter. If on the other hand NCIS finds evidence that points to deliberate slaughter... who do we have to blame for these men's frame of mind? Who created the fighting machines? The attitudes? Fortunately, these situations are not a norm but an exception and yes, someone has to answer for the loss of inocent lives. it's just not going to be me who judges...
My Space Liasion:Will someone please tell me how a sixteen year old cons her parents into getting her a passport? What pausible reason can there be if she isn't traveling with her parents? And can someone tell me how a sixteen year old manages to get out of the country on her own?
My Space is not to be held responsible. This responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of parents. There's no way in hell one of my underage children would get a passport, let alone get her hands on it. A sixteen year old has no business socializing with a 25 year old man (if that's what he truly was). What is happening to our society that we haven't instilled into our children that this sort of thing is unacceptable? Hell, I had a fit when my daughter wanted to date a boy who was a mere two years older than her. I'm sorry, but today's standards, as a general rule, are far too lax. Parents are actually influenced by their child's whinings. Parents don't want to be the bad guy. HELLO! That's part of the job description. Children are walking all over their parents and parents are wondering where the respect is? Again, I say HELLO!
My children (well two out of three, but I'll get to that) were more scared of me than to try drugs or do a host of other things that were not acceptable (translation: not within the boundaries of their good health). Hell, yes, I threatened to beat their backsides until they couldn't sit down for a week if I caught them doing something they knew damn well wasn't right (within reason of course). I never did use corporal punishment as a usual means of punishment, that was saved for the 'big ticket items' or hard heads that just wouldn't get it. It gave them something to use with their peers and trust me, they used it. They knew I meant it and they had to live with me. I don't know how many times, in the course of our conversations these days that they have said to me, " Mom, I use to tell the guys no because you would beat the tar out of my butt when you found out and I was always more afraid of you than what they thought." When I asked them how that went over with their friends, "They say, 'You're afraid of your mom?' 'Damn straight, you don't know my mom.'" Those that did, would back the kiddo up. I have always been fair and tempered, but there were definite boundries and cross them at your own peril. Maybe by today's standards that's harsh, but my children have never been in trouble with the law, are respectful of their Elders and of women. I'm rather proud of their ethics and their outlooks. We don't always agree, I don't expect us to, they're all free thinking adults now.
My oldest son, years ago, had a conversation with me and it came to light that he secretly tried pot. I never had a clue. I waited for that shoe to drop, I just never thought it did. Let's just say that at the age of twenty something, the young man got slapped up the backside of his head for it and what did he do? He grinned. he said, " Sorry, Momma, but I'm a good boy now, I promise." That got an unladylike snort from me. There's still one standing rule around here that they're still answerable too, no matter how old they get, " You better think twice about doing something you know Mom wouldn't approve of because eventually, be it days, months or years from now, she's going to find out and you'll still answer for it."
Damn Straight.
I will no longer have the responsibility of being a parent the day I draw my last breath. I have never given up on one of my children and I never will. I'm just too damn stubborn that way when it's something detrimental to their well-being.
I'm Mom, I'm their role model. I chose to give birth to them. It's a life long contract. If I don't do it, who will?